Archived sample · Real saved data

Aura Network: what the report tells you.

The saved scan found a clear contact route. It flagged different telephone numbers and did not detect clearly attributed customer or partner feedback.

← All sample reports

Historical example—not a live monitoring feed

Website scan: 22 September 2026. Google results: 26 August–22 September 2026 (28 days), imported on 25 September. Archived on 28 September 2026.

This is a public summary of selected saved findings, not a completed monthly-service report. It does not claim that suggested changes were approved or published. New scans may produce different results.

Visit Aura Network ↗

Website readiness

83.18/100

How the sampled website information performed against the scanner’s checks—not a Google rank or proof of AI recommendations.

Google appearances

146

Times a link to this website appeared in Google search results during the stated 28 days. These are not unique visitors.

Google clicks

23

Clicks from Google search results during the same period. Clicks are not confirmed enquiries or sales.

What to keep. What to check next.

Working well

There is a clear contact route

What the scan found
A labelled contact section and a contact method were detected.
What it means for you
Brands and creators have a route to start a conversation.
Suggested next step
Check the destination and response process regularly. This scan did not verify that an enquiry was delivered.

Check the context

Explain which number customers should use

What the scan found
Two different telephone numbers were detected.
What it means for you
This may be intentional—for example, separate contacts for brands and creators. It is not automatically an error.
Suggested next step
Confirm both numbers are current and label their purpose clearly. Correct obsolete or contradictory details only.

Worth reviewing

Help visitors evaluate real experience

What the scan found
The scan did not detect clearly attributed customer or partner feedback.
What it means for you
A genuine comment from a brand, campaign partner or creator can help visitors evaluate the service.
Suggested next step
Check whether feedback exists beyond the scanned pages. Publish permission-approved quotes with attribution if appropriate.

What these numbers do not prove

  • The saved scan was partial. It could not conclusively check how the website handles a missing page. That check is unconfirmed, not a failed result.
  • The readiness score uses scanner version 1.2.1. Automated findings need context and can miss information or raise false alarms.
  • Google appearances and clicks come from saved Search Console daily totals. They do not show whether ChatGPT, Gemini or another AI service recommended the business.
  • No matched before-and-after comparison is presented. These results do not establish that Aureviq caused an increase in traffic, rankings or sales.
See how the scanner is measured and where it can be wrong →